Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ category

Mac & Cheese Sculpture Hits It Out of the Park–Literally!

June 18th, 2010

Even when I was running the marketing departments  of big corporations and had access to eight-figure marketing budgets, I questioned the value of paying big bucks simply to have one of my brand logos grace the wall of an arena or ballpark.  I’ve always felt that merely exposing a logo does very little for you, that you need to be tell your story or somehow deliver a richer and more meaningful experience to your target audience. And that’s why I think Kraft’s new “noodle” sculpture outside Chicago’s Wrigley Field is a real winner (a word with which Wrigley Field has rarely been associated throughout its 95 years).

The sculpture is generating more buzz than those obnoxious Vuvuzela horns at the World Cup.  (Click  news story to see an example of the coverage.)  Of course, part of the coverage is due to the fact that some Cub fans are outraged and insulted by the presence of a “noodle” outside the  venerable Friendly Confines.  But a little controversy can be a good thing, and in this case it appears that the majority of fans are “pro-noodle.”  (When you think about it, the Cubs should be thrilled to have a distraction from the fact that they’re in the midst of yet another lovably losing season.)

What I especially love about this publicity initiative is that Kraft had the guts–and smarts–to avoid splashing a logo on the sculpture.  Instead, the sculpture carries only the words “You know you love it,” which is the tagline for Kraft Macaroni and Cheese.  In fact, when you Google “You know you love it,” the first entry you see takes you to their website.  And when you go there, you see a graphic that is strikingly similar to the Wrigley Field sculpture.

Sorry, but I have to go now; I have a sudden craving for some Mac & Cheese!

HP Does Mediocre

March 12th, 2010

HP is about to launch a new $40 million ad campaign designed to tell the world that it’s more than just the world’s largest manufacturer of printers. This post might set a record for my most premature rant ever, but based on the only ad I’ve seen so far–which takes place in the Venetian Hotel in Las Vegas–I’m not rushing out to buy HP stock.

For one thing, I don’t care for their tagline, “Let’s do amazing.” I’m never crazy about copy that uses poor grammar, but I could forgive that if the words were clever, and especially if they were a natural fit with the brand name. But they’re not. Any number of brands in any number of product categories could lay claim to that tagline just as easily as HP can. Moreover, I can’t imagine anyone ever trying to inspire their co-workers by saying, “Let’s do amazing!”. “Just do it!”, yes, but “Let’s do amazing!”, no.

I’m also not a fan of advertising that relies on celebrities, and this campaign will be swimming in them. I am a fan of the actor Rhys Darby (from HBO’s “Flight of the Conchords”), who’s featured in all of the ads, but apparently most of the ads will also feature additional celebrities like Annie Liebowitz and Dr. Dre. If you’re trying to make HP the star of the campaign, why detract attention from its glow by forcing it to compete with real stars? If HP were a new or unknown brand desperate for credibility, then maybe relying on celebrities would be a wise investment, but I don’t see it making sense in this case.

Finally, the Venetian ad mentions the HP name twice, and shows the logo only once–during the last 3 seconds of the spot. Considering that HP isn’t exactly the most distinctive brand name in the world, the odds of this ad making any meaningful impact seem pretty remote.

Perhaps the campaign will grow on me once I’ve seen more ads. After all, it took me a few times weeks before I realized what a great TV show “Cougartown” is. At this point, however, about the only thing I find amazing about HP’s new campaign is the fact that HP management agreed to spend $40 million on it.

Why Xfinity Is Anything But Comcastic

February 20th, 2010

It was recently announced that the company formerly known as “Comcast” will now be known as “Xfinity.” The ostensible rationale is that since the Comcast brand is associated with cable television, it is cannot effectively represent the expanded services the company is now starting to offer. Interestingly, company spokesmen also acknowledged that the company’s less-than-stellar reputation for customer service had reduced the consumer equity of the Comcast brand.

Okay, I understand the predicament they find themselves in, but I don’t think they have a smart solution. First of all, it doesn’t matter what they call the company if they don’t fix their problems with customer service. Assuming that they do fix those problems, it’s not clear to me that a name change makes sense. I have to believe it will cost tens of millions of dollars more to create awareness of the new brand than it would to tell the story that Comcast has dramatically improved its service. (Note: I wouldn’t say that if the Comcast name were an object of scorn or considered to be the universal symbol for bad service, but I don’t believe that to be the case. Rather, I suspect that most consumers would be willing to change their image of Comcast as long as the company gives them a legitimate reason to do so.)

Moreover, I don’t like the name “Xfinity.” It looks like a typo and sounds like a typo. There’s simply nothing interesting or clever about the name. Two similar but better choices right off the top of my head are “Nfinity” (which sounds like “infinity”) and “Dfinity” (which sounds like “divinity” and is a play on high definition).

To make matters even more confusing, the parent company is still going to retain the name Comcast, so the name they can’t wait to get rid of has been exhumed even before it gets buried.

What’s ironic about all of this is that I’ve always been a fan of their use of the phrase “It’s Comcastic!” To create an adjective that they could own was a brilliant stroke of marketing, and now the value of that trademark will soon be absolutely zero.

I just hope we’re not soon going to be subjected to ads exclaiming, “It’s Xfinitive!”

Lattanzi Ristorante Serves Up Delizioso Service

December 2nd, 2009

The other night a client treated me to a wonderful dinner at Lattanzi Ristorante in the Broadway area of Manhattan. He eats there every time he visits New York, which surprised me given that he’s a real bon vivant who enjoys trying new restaurants. I asked him why he was so loyal to Lattanzi, and he had a great answer.

The first time he ate there several years ago, he and a friend had just happened upon the place. They ended up having a great time, as the food, wine, service and ambience were all excellent. The only problem was that when it was time to pay the fairly sizable bill and he gave the waiter his Visa card, he was informed that the restaurant only takes American Express. Since he didn’t have his American Express card or much cash with him, this wonderful night suddenly looked like it was about to have a very embarrassing and inconvenient ending.

Expecting the worst–after all, he was in a city that’s not exactly known for its warm and fuzzy treatment of visitors–my client asked, “What should I do?” The waiter’s reply: “It’s no big deal; just mail us a check when you get home.”

My client was both shocked and relieved. And not only is he now a very loyal customer, he’s told this story to dozens if not hundreds of people over the years. To be sure, Lattanzi Ristorante took a conscious risk that he would forget or neglect to send them that check. But the potential cost associated with that risk is dwarfed by the value of not only the subsequent business he’s given them himself, but the business from new customers who heard of his experience.

What I love best about the story is that the waiter didn’t create a scene by running to the manager to resolve the problem; he simply dealt with the matter quietly and gracefully right on the spot. Whether he was formally empowered to do this by Lattanzi’s management or he just took it upon himself to do the right thing, it’s a refreshing example of smart customer service.

And smart customer service makes for truly fantastico marketing.

The Times, They Are A-Changin’–for the Worse

November 22nd, 2009

I live in the Chicago area, but my wife and I subscribe to the Sunday New York Times. To me, it’s the second-best newspaper in the country, trailing only the Wall Street Journal. A Sunday without the Times–and particularly without their crossword puzzle–is like a Sunday without….well, without CBS Sunday Morning. It just isn’t Sunday!

So when my Sunday Times didn’t arrive last week, I immediately called their toll-free number to alert them to this impending catastrophe. I was assured by the automated voice at the other end of the line that our paper would be delivered by 9:30 that morning. Whew–Catastrophe averted! Or so I thought. When the paper had yet to arrive at 10:30, I called again, but this time the previously cooperative recorded voice informed me that I was out of luck: they would not be able to deliver the paper to me. I left a “firm” (“firm” being a euphemism for “irate”) voicemail message, naively hoping I would get a return phone call the following day. When that didn’t happen, I called again, and eventually succeeded in reaching a live body. The woman I spoke to was quite cordial and said she would send me a copy of the Sunday paper by second-class mail. Finally, I thought; somebody there understands the concept of customer service! The only downside to my conversation was that it took her about 15 minutes to take care of my paperwork. That should have been a clue that this heart-wrenching story was not to have a happy ending.

The good news: the paper did get delivered. The bad news: it didn’t arrive until Saturday. The worse news: we were sent two copies of the front-half of the paper, and no copies of the other half–the half that would have included my crossword puzzle. I know what you’re thinking: Oh, the humanity!!!

It’s no secret that the newspaper industry is in huge and irreversible trouble. While there are many reasons for this, one could argue that the biggest reason is that newspaper publishers simply lost touch with their readers’ needs, habits and desires. (Surely anyone who has witnessed the Chicago Tribune’s utter disregard for its readers under the insensitive and inept ownership of Sam Zell can second that motion.) In an age where I can get a phone call from Apple’s customer service team within five seconds of submitting a request for service on their website, the kind of customer service exhibited by the New York Times is as antiquated and useless as a Gutenberg printing press.

Loyal customers are hard to come by in any business, and especially in the newspaper business. Failing to make loyal customers feel appreciated is a sure and sad sign of a company whose best days are behind it. That’s clearly the case with most newspapers, and I fear it’s also the case with the New York Times.

I’m not sure that qualifies as news, but I at least hope that it’s fit to print.